Colombian media across the spectrum report that consumer prices in February registered a monthly variation of 1.08%, with annual inflation coming in close to the mid‑5% range and year‑to‑date inflation just above 2%. Both sides agree that education and restaurants/food‑away‑from‑home were the main sectors pulling prices up, while categories such as transportation and health showed comparatively lower pressures, and they concur that the data come from official national statistics for February.

Coverage also aligns in framing the figures as part of a broader disinflation process compared with the peaks of previous years, noting that inflation remains above the central bank’s long‑term target. Both opposition and government‑aligned outlets reference the central bank’s anti‑inflation stance and prior rate hikes, acknowledge the role of seasonal factors like school‑related expenses in February, and situate the new data within ongoing debates over economic policy, labor and tax reforms, and the government’s broader social agenda.

Areas of disagreement

Headline framing and direction of change. Opposition outlets highlight that annual inflation "decreased" to around 5.29%, emphasizing the slowdown from January’s level and presenting the figure as a sign that price pressures are easing despite still being high. Government‑aligned outlets, by contrast, tend to write that inflation "rose" to about 5.29–5.9%, stressing the still‑elevated level and the monthly pickup to underscore that inflation remains a live concern rather than a resolved problem.

Responsibility and policy evaluation. Opposition coverage implicitly credits the central bank’s prior tightening and some global disinflation for the moderation in prices, suggesting the current administration’s fiscal and reform agenda risks undermining these gains. Government‑aligned media place more weight on the government’s social and wage policies as cushioning households from the cost of living, arguing that the inflation path is broadly compatible with its economic strategy and that structural reforms can proceed without reigniting runaway prices.

Sectoral emphasis and social impact. Opposition sources dwell on the fact that inflation in education, restaurants, and hotels remains above the national average, framing this as evidence that essential and everyday services are still becoming less affordable, particularly for middle‑ and low‑income families. Government‑aligned outlets also note those sectors but balance them with mention of milder increases in transportation and health, suggesting the overall inflation mix is manageable and that targeted support measures can address the most affected categories.

Outlook and risk narrative. Opposition coverage tends to warn that keeping inflation near the mid‑5% range leaves little room for policy mistakes, portraying upcoming reforms and spending plans as potential upside risks to prices. Government‑aligned coverage is more optimistic, framing the current figures as compatible with further gradual disinflation and arguing that maintaining social investment and reforms can coexist with a controlled inflation trajectory.

In summary, opposition coverage tends to present the 5‑plus percent inflation figure as an improvement that remains fragile and threatened by the government’s broader agenda, while government-aligned coverage tends to frame it as a still‑high but manageable rate that validates the administration’s policies and allows room for continued reforms.