I vote for Paloma and Oviedo

TL;DR

The author initially supported Sergio Fajardo, then voted for Mauricio Cárdenas.
The author now supports Paloma and Oviedo, seeing them as a choice to recover Colombia and preserve democracy.
The current government is accused of attempting to control institutions, justice, and truth, leading to division and abuse of power.
Paloma and Oviedo are seen as having the capacity to restore authority, protect citizens, and drive progress.
The current economic situation is described as businesses being suffocated, investment stalled, and the cost of living rising.
The author criticizes the government for viewing entrepreneurs as enemies, emphasizing the role of private companies in generating jobs.
The health system is in crisis, and nationalizing services like energy and health is considered a monumental error.
Paloma and Oviedo represent work, preparation, firmness, and love for the country.
The author alerts that Paloma's campaign message is dispersed and not forceful enough.
The campaign needs a strong message about defending democracy, separation of powers, and institutions above individuals.

Continua a leggere l'articolo originale